![]() 02/05/2020 at 14:36 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() 02/05/2020 at 14:43 |
|
The three-spokes. Those are irredeemable .
![]() 02/05/2020 at 14:44 |
|
Low profile...definitely low profile.
![]() 02/05/2020 at 14:52 |
|
The Vic Wagon wouldn’t be that bad if they had gone with a different offset or even staggered sizes.
The red one (is that a Marquis?) wouldn’t be too awful except the three-spokes and normal suspension. If it was lowered with less stupid wheels, might be okay.
![]() 02/05/2020 at 14:54 |
|
I
hope the red one is the one you hate worse.
![]() 02/05/2020 at 14:59 |
|
Street lock D windows are timeless.
Three spoke wheels need to stay in the 90s.
![]() 02/05/2020 at 15:00 |
|
This is just making me want a box Panther in my life.
Especially that wagon. Ditch the mud tires, keep the D-windows, and I’d rock that everyday.
![]() 02/05/2020 at 15:04 |
|
I’m gonna be partyPooper and say 3 spoke low profile do not look good on ANYTHING but top of a dumpster.
That Beefy station wagon tho without parking brakes and oil leaks. Still would!
![]() 02/05/2020 at 15:07 |
|
F’show.
![]() 02/05/2020 at 15:11 |
|
The wagon’s cool honestly. Raise it a bit so the tires actually clear and I’d rock it.
The red one is so stupid it’s stupid. No redemption.
![]() 02/05/2020 at 15:15 |
|
The wagon would be cooler if the tires were a bit narrower.
The red one was actually a rather handsome car to begin with. Those wheels are the worst. Ever.
![]() 02/05/2020 at 15:24 |
|
I don’t know, I kinda like the wider tires. It’s a bit of “It’s so ridiculous, it’s cool.”
The red one would like fine with a better set of wheels, but I also don’t like the painted rear bumper.
![]() 02/05/2020 at 15:38 |
|
I support all cars turned into off-roaders. The TriStar wheels would look silly on anything.
![]() 02/05/2020 at 15:41 |
|
The white one looks quite awesome but I doubt that it could be driven like that.
![]() 02/05/2020 at 15:45 |
|
I have yet to find a car where three spokes don't look lousy on it. Even on vehicles where three spokes were an option the other wheels almost always looked better.
![]() 02/05/2020 at 15:56 |
|
Opponauts have unanimously come out feeling just as I do on this important matter.
![]() 02/05/2020 at 15:59 |
|
I think you hate the first one more.
![]() 02/05/2020 at 16:03 |
|
My dislike of all things three-spoked is intense. Which might explain my apathy toward Mercedes(?)
![]() 02/05/2020 at 16:12 |
|
You mean “ Which do I love more?”
![]() 02/05/2020 at 16:16 |
|
*angry Viper noises
![]() 02/05/2020 at 16:18 |
|
none!
No room for hate when someone actually likes their car.
![]() 02/05/2020 at 16:39 |
|
I think Saab managed to pull it off:
![]() 02/05/2020 at 16:53 |
|
Offset of the 3 spokes is a crime
![]() 02/05/2020 at 16:55 |
|
“unanimously”, lies
![]() 02/05/2020 at 18:42 |
|
FIVE shall be the number of spokes, the number of spokes will be five. Six is okay but four and three are out of the question.
![]() 02/05/2020 at 20:33 |
|
I think if you have a four-lug bolt pattern, you might be able to argue for a wheel with four spokes.
![]() 02/05/2020 at 21:39 |
|
I fucking NEED the bottom one!!!
![]() 02/05/2020 at 23:53 |
|
4 way symmetry looks fine with 4 bolt wheels, But I just find 4 spokes awkward
![]() 02/06/2020 at 00:16 |
|
![]() 02/06/2020 at 06:24 |
|
Palate cleanser:
And these look so wrong they’re nearly right:
![]() 02/06/2020 at 06:28 |
|
How do you feel about 35?
![]() 02/06/2020 at 11:12 |
|
35 is cool, but the coolness powers of the cougar emblem are unstoppable.